Clap Your Hands Say Yeah puts up a good fight. Along Hysterical, the band has a clear evolution of the style they’re in right now. We, as listeners, can watch them become stronger within the energy they’ve decided to conquer at this stage in their careers. It’s mostly light and flowing as opposed to their usual. What’s exciting about their change of pace can quickly be compromised for a single-toned sort of safe complexion throughout.
A lot of hype has gone into the release of Clap Your Hands Say Yeah’s new album. Unfortunately, many of the people placing hope for great music on this album might be let down. Hysterical has no surprises, no astonishments and no incredibility. Only once or twice does it have the listener really going. Aside from that, much of the same work is repeated musically.
The record is a little more pop-rock than indie-experimental and that’s its greatest mistake. The work of the band since their beginning has followed more of an individual indie rock style but it seems that now they’ve settled for a more mainstream tone that we’ve heard before. It’s a shame that CYHSY couldn’t take a bigger risk or even go along with what they’ve produced in the past. This is an obvious downgrade from what we’re used to hearing from them.
Hysterical has got decent craftsmanship and execution of thoughts and ideas. Their greatest moment is at the beginning of the album in “Same Mistake.” It’s unclear whether the song sounds good because it is a legitimately good song or just because it’s new to the listener, and fresh because it’s the first song.
Either way, it’s fun. The sound is much like Two Door Cinema Club mixed with the New Pornographers and a drowsy vocalist. It’s not the most appealing combination but it’s also its own tone. For that, they deserve a bit of credit.
After the leading track introduces the album, we hear the meaning of the album in the title track “Hysterical.” You’d think that Clap Your Hands Say Yeah would put their all into this kind of title. However, their motives lack explanation. “Hysterical” isn’t actually hysterical. It’s more like “slightly laughable.”
CYHSY's songwriting gets its best attention early on during "Misspent Youth," an ode to the shamelessly shameful moments of childhood and adolescence. It's neat how they use the lyrics “the engine was not built to last”as the perfect metaphor for their past.
“In A Motel” is where the album tries vehemently to get creative, impelementing some synth and interesting guitar riffs as it slows down a bit. It isn’t terrible, especially because it finally goes for a newer sound halfway through the album. Yet still, it’s obvious that the band tried a bit too hard to sound edgy and avant garde on the track. It’s just weird.
What’s also weird is the way the band chose to sign off. The song before the instrumental could’ve amounted to something, but instead, the piano vocal track sounded like it had taken a sleeping pill.
From there, the pace picked up into a racing track where every instrument fought for attention, including the vocal. It’s difficult to listen to and not a good way to dismiss the listener.
All in all, Hysterical isn’t what it promises. It may be a play on words, but soon, it becomes a play on the listener, and eventually, a play on the band. Sorry, folks.
Rating: 2.5 out of 5 stars.

OPENING: 1/2
ReplyDeleteIDENTIFICATION: ☆
SUMMARY: 1/2
OPINION: ☆
CLOSING: ☆
TOTAL: ☆☆☆☆
The only problem I really had with this review, which is why I gave you half stars for the intro and summary is that the review sounds like its intended for people previously familiar with the band. I think if you gave more general information about the band so that the reader unaware of cyhsy can feel more engaged and interested in the information it would really excel the quality of the post. good review though and don't give up hope, every band has their lackluster album.
Opening: *
ReplyDeleteIdentification: ½*
Summary: ½*
Opinion: *
Closing: *
Total: ****
I agree that had I known more about the band I think I would’ve gotten more out of this review. You could have given me more on their background, the type of music they became popular for, just anything on their past and previous music style just to get a feel (you could have even posted some YouTube videos within your review just to feel a few samples of their music). You argue very well on the band’s slight direction towards mainstream music. If there’s one thing I’d be pick at, it’s your closing, not sure why there are some sentences with only two or three sentences, you could combine them together, make it look a little compact.
Hi Jason, I think Stacy and Alfredo both put their finger on something here: it's not that your review isn't detailed enough, it's that the mix of details is a little off. More background/context for the reader who isn't familiar with the band's arc is needed to be able to understand some of the comparisons you make or metaphors you use to describe individual moments in the songs. No question you listened to the album carefully--but you need to put yourself in the reader's shoes a little bit to figure out what all they need to understand your impressions.
ReplyDelete